October 29, 2019
At lunch on the fourth day England
The end of Root&customized stress ball
Manufacturer39;s 205-ball innings left England 159-4 in the 78th over. The
scale of the task confronting Root's men was evident from the fact that only
three sides have made more than 300 to win in the fourth innings of a Test at
Headingley -- Australia (404-3 in 194
, England (315-4 against Australia, 2001)
and the West Indies with 322-5 two years ago.
, England (315-4 against Australia, 2001)
and the West Indies with 322-5 two years ago.
Stokes hit on the head -England
had yet to add to their overnight score when Stokes missed an a pull off a Josh
Hazlewood bouncer that smashed into his helmet, with the stem guard -- which he
was using for the first time -- protecting his neck flying off at the back. Lyon
returned before lunch in a bid to break the stand but, although he beat Stokes
on the outside edge, Bairstow swept him for four.Left-handed batsman Stokes,
determined to keep his wicket intact, was then unbeaten on two, having faced 50
balls. Eventually Root scored England's first run of Sunday's play off the 26th
ball of the day only to be dismissed soon afterwards. Root, shortly before the
new ball became available, went down the pitch to off-spinner Nathan Lyon's
third delivery of the day and tried to work it legside.
England's hopes of
achieving a victory that would rival their celebrated Headingley Ashes successes
of both 1981, when they won after following-on, and 2001 when Mark # Butcher's
173 not out saw them chase down a target of 315, suffered a setback early Sunday
when England captain Joe Root was out for 77 after adding just two runs to his
overnight score.. Stokes carved Pat Cummins over the slip cordon for another
boundary greeted with huge cheers by a capacity crowd before James Pattinson,
failing to control the swing, bowled a ball that went for five wides after
bursting through Warner's hands.But the ball deflected off his back leg, looped
over Australia captain and wicket-keeper Tim Paine, with David Warner taking a
superb diving catch at first slip.If Australia win this match they will retain
the Ashes at 2-0 up with two to play. The all-rounder, who made an unbeaten
century in the drawn second Test at Lord's, was cleared to bat on, however.At
lunch on the fourth day England -- bowled out for just 67 in their first innings
-- were 238-4, needing a further 121 runs to win. Stokes was 32 not out and
Bairstow 34 not out, with their unbroken partnership so far worth 79 runs.
(Photo:AFP) Leeds: Ben Stokes and Jonny Bairstow maintained England's bid for an
extraordinary comeback win in the third Test against Australia at Headingley on
Sunday. But on another sun-drenched day in Leeds, their four-man attack managed
just one wicket between them on an increasingly docile pitch during Sunday's
first session, with the fast bowlers unable to break through with the new
ball.Australia took the new ball but it was not long before Bairstow cover-drove
Josh Hazlewood for a textbook four through the covers. England resumed on 156-3,
with Root, like Bairstow playing on his Yorkshire home ground, 75 not out after
sharing a partnership of 126 in 53 overs with Joe Denly (50) on Saturday.
At
lunch on the fourth day England -- bowled out for just 67 in their first innings
-- were 238-4, needing a further 121 runs to reach a victory target of 359 that
would see them level the five-match Ashes series at 1-1.There was another huge
roar from the crowd when Stokes hooked Cummins for a soaring six, with England
scoring 60 runs in eight overs with the new ball -- an amazing turn of events
given a woeful first innings that saw them post their lowest Ashes total in 71
years. Ben Stokes and Jonny Bairstow maintained England's bid for an
extraordinary comeback win in the third Test against Australia at Headingley on
Sunday
Posted by: keychaintoys at
02:41 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 657 words, total size 4 kb.
October 24, 2019
You want your best batsman to perform
You want your best batsman to perform. You need to back it up with evidence.
Should Aussies mellow down a bit?I think the media blows sledging out of
proportion. The attitude the Australians have to get back to is the right
balance of killer instinct and competitive nature.How did the recent
ball-tampering incident affect you?It’s been a lot of different emotions. It’s
up to the umpires and the technology at hand. They have done it ever since I was
playing. On top of that, they then admitted it at a press conference, which made
it worse…Yes, they should have sent the coach for a PC like every other team
does. They have been severely punished. I expect Bumrah to do really well simply
because of the way he bowls. He can’t just go out and play his game and hit
through the line. I know the way the Kiwis go about it and I respect that. He
has got to be able to adapt.. He will enjoy bowling with the duke ball which has
a pronounced seam. Well, most of these guys have played in England before. There
will be a little bit of seam movement and swing in the air. A lot has been said.
The punishment has been quite extreme. They have to rely on experience. There
were a lot of errors made from the outset. If it’s happening, it’s really
disappointing.. Abuse and being personal; all these things are crossing the
line. They know that what they did was wrong. It’s a question of the Indian
batsmen getting enough runs,†he saidMcGrath, who is here to supervise MRF Pace
Foundation camp, also spoke on the ball-tampering row that shook the cricket
world.Virat Kohli vs James Anderson is expected to be the defining battle during
the Test series…Obviously, Kohli is a more experienced player this time around.
When you have got a bowler like Anderson who knows the conditions so well and
bowling pretty well at the moment, it’s going to be a lot of hard work for
Kohli.
You said the Austr alians were naïve. But if you look at positives to come
out of pu ball Supplier it, it will be
interesting to see what happens if somebody gets done for ball tampering in the
future now.ExcerptsIndia will be playing a Test series in England after a lot of
white-ball cricket."Bhuvi and Bumrah have got pretty good control. If he
performs, it will have a knock-on effect on the rest of the team. I think the
Australian way is to play hard and tough in the middle, but in all fairness. If
they see it as a problem, they have to be really proactive and get on top of it.
With technology and 30-odd cameras around, they can see everything. That’s what
you need in England. I think sledging is a wrong term.Do you think Steve Smith
and David Warner can bounce back?Yes, everyone makes mistakes.There have been
suggestions that Australia have to cut down on sledging. In Australia, we call
it a little bit of mongrel. Does it worry you?There is always a concern if it’s
true. Warner might find it a little tougher coming back, but he, too, is good a
player as well. Experience plays a big part to be able to adjust and adapt
quickly. He has got to be prepared to work hard. There is nothing new I can add
to what happened. He has got a unique action, but he bowls good lengths. They
had to front the media and everyone back home. I’m sure Smith will come back a
better person and player. It’s a low point for Australian cricket. There is
always a bit of chat. If anyone gets done again, the punishment might be a
little bit harsher. There’s no doubt that he’s a quality batsman, but the
English conditions are pretty tough. The little bit of chatting is putting a
pressure on the opponents and making them feel uncomfortable. That’s where the
line was crossed previously.The Aussie expects Bhuvi, Bumrah to excel in
England. Australia need these quality players in the team.Al Jazeera’s sting
operation and corruption in cricket.. I’m looking forward to that battle. In
England, you just have to get the right length. If we become too nice on the
field, that’s not the Australian way. Glenn McGrath Chennai: Former Australia
pacer Glenn McGrath feels Bhuvneshwar Kumar and Jasprit Bumrah will enjoy
bowling in England conditions and the onus is on India’s batsmen to deliver in
the highly-anticipated five-Test series in August. I don’t know whether you can
stop it. They can see what’s happening. So the line in the sand has been drawn
there. How challenging is it going to be for them to adapt to the red ball in
the English conditions?A lot of it depens on the tour matches and the
preparation time. You have got to adapt a lot quicker these days. To think that
you can get away with that in the first place was very naive. It’s hard to
comment as nothing has been proved yet and I haven’t seen the footage.Can ball
tampering be stopped?The umpires are in a good position
Posted by: keychaintoys at
04:31 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 871 words, total size 5 kb.
October 17, 2019
The crowds loved the experience with a total attendance of 123
The match was the sport&China pu anti stress
balls Factory039;s first ever day-night Test. Based on the initial evidence,
day-night Tests look set to become part of global cricket schedules for years to
come.â€.â€Australia coach Darren Lehmann agreed but fully supported the day-night
Test concept. Under lights the pink ball responded a little bit much. McCullum
felt there was a "touch too much†grass on the strip and said it was something
to keep in mind for the next day-night Test.
Overall, it’s a roaring success —
120,000 people turning up over three days.19 million prime-time TV viewers
across the nation watching Sunday’s last day, far more than normal for the third
day of a Test.jpg New Zealand's Brendon McCullum slides to field a ball in front
of pigeons during their Test against Australia in Adelaide, Australia.Rival
skippers Steve Smith and Brendon McCullum were in unison about the success of
the initiative.The national body see day-night cricket along with the luminous
pink-ball as the panacea to arrest dwindling interest in the traditional
five-day format. McCullum enthused: It’s a great concept.Test cricket got a
pulsating makeover as Australia claimed a thrilling three-wicket win over New
Zealand in the first Test in the game’s 138-year history to be played under
lights. "It’s meant to allow Tests to be played at night and it’s not meant to
differ or change how Test cricket is played."The whole Test match was a great
innovation, it was a great spectacle, and to get 120,000 people through the
gates in three days is absolutely amazing,†said Australia’s Smith.New Zealand's
Brendon McCullum slides to field a ball in front of pigeons during their Test
against Australia in Adelaide, Australia.
As pink-ball cricket evolves we’ll see
the pitches won’t have quite as much grass on them,†he said. The match was the
sport's first ever day-night Test. — AP cricket 1. People are voting with their
feet."Maybe a little less grass, as a batter at night it was quite difficult,â€
Lehmann said, but added: "It was exciting.â€Prior concerns over the durability
and visibility of the pink ball prompted Adelaide ground staff to produce a
grassy pitch and square to ensure the newly-designed ball stayed in shape
longer. — APMore pink-ball day-night Test matches are planned after the
spectacular success of the historic trailblazer at the Adelaide Oval, which won
plaudits from fans and players.
I don’t see why not, right time, place and
conditions and the fans are calling out for it,†CA chief executive James
Sutherland said of the chances of the Gabba getting a pink-ball Test.†The
glowing praise appeared to justify Cricket Australia’s bold initiative and is
emboldening them to flag the prospect of two more day-night Tests when South
Africa and Pakistan tour in 2016.
The crowds loved the experience with a total
attendance of 123,736 fans thronging into Adelaide Oval over the three lively
days.There were no major problems with the ball and not once was it changed
during the three days of play.Host broadcaster, the Nine Network, was also
beaming with 3. The opening day gate of 47,441 was the biggest at the Adelaide
Test since the famous 1932-33 "bodyline†series.Thirty-seven wickets tumbled in
three days as the pink ball dominated the bat, in stark contrast to the
run-laden low-attended first two Tests in Brisbane and Perth. I think it’s here
to stay, which is great.
The South Australian Cricket Association is already
negotiating to host another day-nighter against Pakistan in Adelaide in December
2016, while South Africa are expected to get their first experience of pink ball
cricket in Brisbane in the traditional home season opening Test."The Gabba is a
good option and have upgraded their # lights, and I would have thought a balmy
Test would be a pretty good place to watch cricket. It’s great to see a contest
between bat and ball
Posted by: keychaintoys at
01:59 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 654 words, total size 4 kb.
October 10, 2019
The replays showed that the England batsmen
So it&pu anti
stress balls Manufacturer39;s unfortunate that there was a judgment error on
the timing of the release of the ball and where the batsmen were. It becomes an
overthrow from the instant of the throw," the Sydney Morning Herald quoted
Taufel, as saying. Then they've got to look to see when the ball is released, in
case there is an overthrow.
As the hosts needed nine runs off three balls,
all-rounder Ben Stokes hit the ball into the deep off Trent Boult and ran for a
double.New Zealand had set up 242 for England. There's a lot of 'what ifs' and
'what should bes' and 'what could bes' that happen off those 600-plus
deliveries. In the end, England were announced as the winner as they had hit
more boundaries, 26, as compared to New Zealand's 17 boundaries in the
match.
According to the Law 19.As a result, five runs should have been awarded to
England and Stokes should have been at the non-striker's end for the next ball.
You've got the best two umpires in the elite panel doing the final. The judgment
error was the timing of when the fielder threw the ball. They did not cross on
their second run, at the instant of the throw."We're not perfect. And that
happens every delivery of the game. They forget we make 1000s of decisions every
match," he said."They've then got to follow on and see what happens after that,
whether there is a run out, whether there's an 'obstructing the field', whether
the ball is taken fairly. I think it's unfair to say that the World Cup was
decided by that one event. And then they've got to back to see where the two
batsmen are," he said.England scripted history as it claimed its first-ever
World Cup title. England scripted history as it claimed its first-ever World Cup
title. They're doing their best like the other two teams are. As a result,
England were awarded six runs - two for a double and four for an overthrow.
There's multitudes of decisions to be taken off the one delivery. That's the
nature of sport," he said."In this particular case, the umpires have got a lot
on their plate, because like every ball, they've had to watch the batsmen
complete the first run, they've had to watch the ball being fielded, to
understand how it's in play, whether the fielder's done the right thing. So
given that scenario, five runs should have been the correct allocation of runs,
and Ben Stokes should have been at the non-striker's end for the next delivery,"
he said.Taufel, who had umpired during the 2011 World Cup final, confirmed that
Dharmasena and Marais Erasmus made a mistake. The final will be remembered for
ages as it did not have a winner after the 50-over and super over action, both
of which were tied. That's the act."There was a judgment error on the
overthrow.Taufel, a member of the MCC Laws subcommittee, also said that the
umpires did their best and it would be unfair to say that one decision costed
New Zealand their maiden victory in the tournament.The retired Australian umpire
said that there was a judgment of error as Stokes and Adil Rashid had not
crossed for the second run.
Taufel, who had umpired during the 2011 World Cup
final, confirmed that # the officiating umpires Kumar Dharmasena and Marais
Erasmus made a mistake. In the end, England were announced as the winner as they
had hit more boundaries, 26, as compared to New Zealand's 17 boundaries in the
match.8 related to an "overthrow or wilful act of fielder", says, "If the
boundary results from an overthrow or from the wilful act of a fielder, the runs
scored shall be any runs for penalties awarded to either side, and the allowance
for the boundary, and the runs completed by the batsmen, together with the run
in progress if they had already crossed at the instant of the throw or act. This
is just part of the game.Taufel, who was named the International Cricket Council
(ICC) Umpire of the Year every year from 2004 to 2008, further said the umpires
have to follow and examine whether there is a run out, an obstruction on the
field and whether the ball has been taken fairly.
However, Taufel defended the
officiating umpires, saying the umpires have to consider a number of things
while examining every ball. (Photo:AP/AFP) Sydney: A day after England lifted
its maiden ICC Men's Cricket World Cup trophy, former Australian umpire Simon
Taufel on Monday said that England should have got only five runs instead of six
runs off the third ball of the last over against New Zealand.
The replays showed
that the England batsmen had not crossed at the time of the throw. The final
will be remembered for ages as it did not have a winner after the 50-over and
super over action, both of which were tied. New Zealand's Martin Guptill threw
the ball in an attempt to run out Stokes but the ball bounced off Stokes' bat
and reached the boundary. What's unfortunate is that people think that umpiring
is just about outs and not outs. The act of the overthrow starts when the
fielder releases the ball
Posted by: keychaintoys at
02:32 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 886 words, total size 5 kb.
<< Page 1 of 1 >>
27kb generated in CPU 0.0058, elapsed 0.0438 seconds.
30 queries taking 0.0394 seconds, 48 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
30 queries taking 0.0394 seconds, 48 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
