January 06, 2020

He was not afraid to come on to the front foot

It seemed India’s brittle tail will not put up much of a fight yet again, but Jadeja and Ishant batted sensibly in their 116-ball stand, defying the West Indian pacers.The lanky India pacer, whose highest score is 31, was finally dismissed in the 90th over, playing on to a full slower ball off Gabriel.Jadeja (58 off 112) and Ishant (19 off 62) were able to negotiate the threat posed by the potent pace duo of Shannon Gabriel and Kemar Roach after losing Rishabh Pant (24) in the second over of the day.


Pant was guilty of playing the ball with hard hands as skipper Jason Holder took a regulation catch at second slip, leaving India at 207 for seven.chinadzgroup.Only 68.Vice-captain Ajinkya Rahane had made a crucial 81 on the opening day to help India recover from a poor start.The following ball, he swept Chase for a six over deep midwicket, giving the Indian innings a welcome flourish towards the end. 

He was not afraid to come on to the front foot and was equally comfortable at tackling the rising ball.While maturity was expected from Jadeja, Ishant impressed with the way he dealt with the express pace of Roach and Gabriel.5 overs of play was possible as inclement weather led to multiple interruptions on the first day of the match, a part of the World Championship. Rahane silenced his critics with a much-needed 81 on a pacer-friendly track even as the likes of skipper Virat Kohli, Chesteshwar Pujara and Mayank Agarwal found the going tough on the pacer-friendly wicket on Thursday.. Jadeja’s innings comprised six fours and a maximum before he became the last man to be dismissed in the Indian innings, leading to lunch.Rahane, Jadeja and Ishant lift India to a respectable first innings total.Mohammad Shami joined Jadeja in the middle but his stay lasted only one ball as he offered a return catch to off-spinner Roston Chase. 

Running out of partners, Jadeja showed urgency to collect some vital runs and brought up his 11th half-century with a slap to cover for four.India resumed the day at 203 for six with Pant (20) and Jadeja being the overnight China auto bearings factorys Suppliers they helped India to 297 at lunch on day two of the first Test here on Friday. (Photo: AFP) North Sound (Antigua): Ravindra Jadeja and Ishant Sharma frustrated West Indies with a timely 60 run-stand for the eighth wicket as pressure relief ball Factory Ajinkya Rahane made a crucial 81 on the opening day to help India recover from a poor start. Roach got his fourth wicket of the innings when he dismissed Pant with a beauty from around the wicket that moved away enough to get the edge of the young wicketkeeper-batsman. While Jadeja justified his inclusion in the playing XI ahead of Ravichandran Ashwin with a gritty effort, Pant could not deliver for the team

Posted by: keychaintoys at 08:06 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 491 words, total size 3 kb.

December 18, 2019

The results also found women having high blood pressure

Out of the 5,646 patients who were still alive in 1996, researchers examined those who were diagnosed with dementia and tracked them for 15 years more. China pu slow rising balls Manufacturer Representational Image. Participants were around 33-years-old and had their blood pressure monitored, according to a report by the Daily Mail.For the study, 7,238 people were tracked since the mid 1960s. 


The results also found women having high blood pressure in their 40s have a 65% increased risk of dementia, while those who develop high blood pressure in their 40s were 73% more likely to develop the disease.The study was originally published in the journal Neurology."High blood pressure in midlife is a known risk factor for dementia, but these results may help us better understand when this association starts, how changes in blood pressure affect the risk of dementia and what the differences are between men and women," lead author of the study Dr Rachel Whitmer told the Daily Mail.The surprising results showed women who had high blood pressure years earlier were more likely to develop the mental health condition. (Photo: Pixabay) A new study has revealed that women in their 40s with high blood pressure have a 73% increased risk of dementia.When researchers monitored them again in the mid-1970s, they discovered 22% of them had higher blood pressure - 14 percent of women and 31% of men.The findings may help better further understand how changes in blood pressure affects the risk of dementia. 18% of women and 25% of men. The results showed 22% had high blood pressure following an examination in their 40s.

Posted by: keychaintoys at 03:10 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 275 words, total size 2 kb.

December 12, 2019

The management on tour is very sad about that decision

An extraordinary flag protest by Sri Lanka following an incorrect no-ball call overshadowed China pu anti stress balls Factory a rain-marred fourth day of the third Test at Lord’s on Sunday that left the tourists struggling to avoid a An extraordinary flag protest by Sri Lanka following an incorrect no-ball call overshadowed a rain-marred fourth day of the third Test at Lord’s on Sunday that left the tourists struggling to avoid a series whitewash against England.


Alex Hales was 41 not out and nightwatchman Steven Finn six not out.Hales had moved on to 45 when Sunday’s third ball saw him survive a confident lbw appeal from Sri Lanka paceman Shaminda Eranga.Indian umpire S. Ravi ruled in Hales’s favour but the Sri Lankans reviewed, only for a marginal ‘umpire’s call’ verdict from the Decision Review System to spare the batsman.Hales had moved on to 58 when Nuwan Pradeep knocked his off-stump with a ball that kept low.But Australian umpire Rod Tucker had already called a no-ball.

Replays suggested Pradeep’s front foot may have been behind the crease but fielding teams are unable to challenge a no-ball call by an umpire and Hales survived.In February, a similar incident saw Australia’s Adam Voges make 239 in a Test against New Zealand in Wellington after being reprieved on seven following an incorrectly called no-ball by English umpire Richard Illingworth.Under current International Cricket Council regulations, the third umpire is powerless to intervene in such situations.Sri Lanka team manager Charith Senanayake, a former Test opener, and coach Graham Ford approached match referee Andy Pycroft to register their unhappiness.Meanwhile, the Sri Lanka flag was draped over the tourists’ dressing-room balcony for some 45 minutes in protest at the decision."You feel a little down, it is sad,” Sri Lanka Cricket president Thilinga Sumathipala told reporters.

The management on tour is very sad about that decision."It will be reported to the ICC.” Asked to explain how the flag protest came about, he added: "It must have been the team to show the management’s feelings on the field."It is to say ‘Boys get together, it is not the end of the world, we are still fighting for the match so therefore play for the country.’ It is a symbol.”

Posted by: keychaintoys at 01:43 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 379 words, total size 3 kb.

December 04, 2019

The southpaw was on one when he inside

Zing bails –- which contain lights that flash when the ball strikes the wicket –- have been a sore point in the current World Cup. China jumbo squishies toy Manufacturer Australia opener David Warner became the fifth batsman at the World Cup to get an unexpected reprieve after he dragged a ball on to his stump but the impact failed to dislodge the zing bails in Sunday’s match against India. (Photo:AFP) London: India captain Virat Kohli wants cricket’s authorities to look into the issue of cricket bails not being knocked off by the ball thanks to new technology.Australia opener David Warner became the fifth batsman at the World Cup to get an unexpected reprieve after he dragged a ball on to his stump but the impact failed to dislodge the zing bails in Sunday’s match against India.


The southpaw was on one when he inside-edged a Jasprit Bumrah delivery on to his leg stump but much to his delight the bails did not come off."I haven’t seen that happen so many times in the past,” Kohli told reporters at a briefing."I’m sure no team would like seeing stuff like that when you actually bowl a good ball and then you don’t get the guy out, the ball hits the stump and the lights don’t come on, or the lights come on and the bail comes back on to the stump.”Zing bails –- which contain lights that flash when the ball strikes the wicket –- have been a sore point in the current World Cup.South Africa’s Quinton de Kock, Sri Lankan Dimuth Karunaratne, West Indian Chris Gayle and Mohammad Saifuddin of Bangladesh have already enjoyed similar luck at this World Cup but several former players felt it was harsh on the bowlers."This can’t keep happening with the bails!!! Hard enough being a bowler nowadays... needs changing,” tweeted former England captain Nasser Hussain.Former Pakistan speedster Shoaib Akhtar also took to Twitter to express his dismay.

What’s going on?? In my entire life, I have not seen five instances like this, let alone in the space of 10 days or a tournament,” he wrote.Today is the 5th instance of ball hitting the stumps and bails not falling.5th instance, WITHIN this World Cup.Whats going on?? 🤔🤔In my entire life i have not seen 5 instances like this, let alone in the space of 10 days or a tournament!!#AUSvIND #CWC19— Shoaib Akhtar (@shoaib100mph) June 9, 2019On the eve of the match against India, Australia captain Aaron Finch said the zing bails appeared to need a bigger impact to be dislodged from their grooves."The bails seem to be a lot heavier, so it does take a bit of force,” he said on Saturday, pointing to similar cases during the Indian Premier League (IPL) Twenty20 competition."I’ve seen it a handful of times now in IPL and Big Bash where the ball rolls back on to the stumps, where the bails traditionally one of them will pop off."I think it’s just one of those things that you are aware of that when you’re on the right side of it, you are aware of it a bit easier than when you’re not.”

Posted by: keychaintoys at 03:51 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 531 words, total size 3 kb.

November 15, 2019

In the only match to feature any goals

Giorgian de Arrascaeta, Edinson Cavani and Suarez had all put the ball in the net, only to be denied by a linesman&pu ball Supplier039;s flag. Gallese guessed the right way for the first shoot-out penalty to deny Barcelona forward Suarez. (Photo: AP) Salvador: Goalkeeper Pedro Gallese saved Luis Suarez's spot-kick as Peru beat Uruguay on penalties on Saturday to reach the Copa America semi-finals, where they will face Chile.Edison Flores scored the decisive penalty as Peru, who were thrashed 5-0 by Brazil in their previous match, qualified for the semi-finals for the third time in the last four editions of the Copa.It was a remarkable turnaround for Gallese, who was the # villain of that thumping by the hosts, gifting Brazil their second goal by clearing the ball straight to Roberto Firmino, while he was also partially at fault for the first and third scores.But in Salvador he guessed the right way for the first shoot-out penalty to deny Barcelona forward Suarez, after which Peru's own penalty-takers were faultless.

I'm very proud of our team, I can't really put it into words," said Peru captain Paolo Guerrero."A lot of people said we don't have the fortitude and guts. But we showed today on the pitch that we could take them on head-on."Peru has hunger, Peru is a warrior, Peru has guts." It was the third Copa quarter-final to finish goalless and head to penalties after Uruguay had three goals ruled out for offside during normal time.Giorgian de Arrascaeta, Edinson Cavani and Suarez had all put the ball in the net, only to be denied by a linesman's flag."It's a bitter and sad feeling. We had high hopes to qualify, but simply couldn't," said Uruguay's captain Diego Godin."We lacked a goal. We tried, we looked for it... (But) three were disallowed."]Brazil beat Paraguay on spot-kicks on Thursday and champions Chile did likewise to knock-out Colombia on Friday.

In the only match to feature any goals, Argentina defeated Venezuela 2-0 on Friday.Peru will face Chile in the second semi-final in Porto Alegre on Wednesday, a day after hosts Brazil take on Argentina in Belo Horizonte.Copa winners in 1939 and 1975, Peru lost to Chile in the semi-finals four years ago.Incredible missAfter a slow opening, Uruguay burst into life on 15 minutes when Federico Valverde surged onto a loose Peru pass in their own half and picked out an unmarked Luis Suarez on the penalty spot, but the Barcelona forward couldn't keep down his header.Two minutes later Nahitan Nandez broke into the box from the flank but his shot was blocked by a sliding defender.In pouring rain, Uruguay looked set to take the lead on 24 minutes with a rapier counter-attack, but Cavani ballooned the ball into the sky from six yards after Gallese parried Suarez's shot, although it wouldn't have counted as the Barcelona forward was retroactively deemed offside when he received the ball.

Moments later Nandez headed over from six yards. De Arrascaeta had the ball in the net on 28 minutes but that was chalked off for an offside against Nandez.Peru finally created a worthy chance late in the first half but Jose Gimenez made a stunning recovery tackle to deny Guerrero a goalscoring chance. Up the other end, Gallese made himself big to block Cavani's shot on the turn.Cavani and Suarez deniedGallese was called into action early in the second period to punch out a dipping Valverde free-kick.Center-back Godin, up for a throw-in deep in Peruvian territory, emulated Cavani's first-half howler, spooning over from seven yards after he was picked out by Suarez.

Cavani appeared to have broken the deadlock just before the hour mark as he latched onto a Suarez through ball and chipped Gallese, but he was pulled up for offside.Suarez poked home a Martin Caceres cross inside the six yard box on 73 minutes, but that too was ruled offside.Uruguay pushed hard late on but Peru held out as Suarez failed to make contact with the ball when trying to lob Gallese in the clearest chance.

Posted by: keychaintoys at 07:40 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 678 words, total size 4 kb.

October 17, 2019

The crowds loved the experience with a total attendance of 123

The match was the sport&China pu anti stress balls Factory039;s first ever day-night Test. Based on the initial evidence, day-night Tests look set to become part of global cricket schedules for years to come.”.”Australia coach Darren Lehmann agreed but fully supported the day-night Test concept. Under lights the pink ball responded a little bit much. McCullum felt there was a "touch too much” grass on the strip and said it was something to keep in mind for the next day-night Test. 


Overall, it’s a roaring success — 120,000 people turning up over three days.19 million prime-time TV viewers across the nation watching Sunday’s last day, far more than normal for the third day of a Test.jpg New Zealand's Brendon McCullum slides to field a ball in front of pigeons during their Test against Australia in Adelaide, Australia.Rival skippers Steve Smith and Brendon McCullum were in unison about the success of the initiative.The national body see day-night cricket along with the luminous pink-ball as the panacea to arrest dwindling interest in the traditional five-day format. McCullum enthused: It’s a great concept.Test cricket got a pulsating makeover as Australia claimed a thrilling three-wicket win over New Zealand in the first Test in the game’s 138-year history to be played under lights. "It’s meant to allow Tests to be played at night and it’s not meant to differ or change how Test cricket is played."The whole Test match was a great innovation, it was a great spectacle, and to get 120,000 people through the gates in three days is absolutely amazing,” said Australia’s Smith.New Zealand's Brendon McCullum slides to field a ball in front of pigeons during their Test against Australia in Adelaide, Australia.

As pink-ball cricket evolves we’ll see the pitches won’t have quite as much grass on them,” he said. The match was the sport's first ever day-night Test. — AP cricket 1. People are voting with their feet."Maybe a little less grass, as a batter at night it was quite difficult,” Lehmann said, but added: "It was exciting.”Prior concerns over the durability and visibility of the pink ball prompted Adelaide ground staff to produce a grassy pitch and square to ensure the newly-designed ball stayed in shape longer. — APMore pink-ball day-night Test matches are planned after the spectacular success of the historic trailblazer at the Adelaide Oval, which won plaudits from fans and players.

I don’t see why not, right time, place and conditions and the fans are calling out for it,” CA chief executive James Sutherland said of the chances of the Gabba getting a pink-ball Test.” The glowing praise appeared to justify Cricket Australia’s bold initiative and is emboldening them to flag the prospect of two more day-night Tests when South Africa and Pakistan tour in 2016.

The crowds loved the experience with a total attendance of 123,736 fans thronging into Adelaide Oval over the three lively days.There were no major problems with the ball and not once was it changed during the three days of play.Host broadcaster, the Nine Network, was also beaming with 3. The opening day gate of 47,441 was the biggest at the Adelaide Test since the famous 1932-33 "bodyline” series.Thirty-seven wickets tumbled in three days as the pink ball dominated the bat, in stark contrast to the run-laden low-attended first two Tests in Brisbane and Perth. I think it’s here to stay, which is great.

The South Australian Cricket Association is already negotiating to host another day-nighter against Pakistan in Adelaide in December 2016, while South Africa are expected to get their first experience of pink ball cricket in Brisbane in the traditional home season opening Test."The Gabba is a good option and have upgraded their # lights, and I would have thought a balmy Test would be a pretty good place to watch cricket. It’s great to see a contest between bat and ball

Posted by: keychaintoys at 01:59 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 654 words, total size 4 kb.

October 10, 2019

The replays showed that the England batsmen

So it&pu anti stress balls Manufacturer39;s unfortunate that there was a judgment error on the timing of the release of the ball and where the batsmen were. It becomes an overthrow from the instant of the throw," the Sydney Morning Herald quoted Taufel, as saying. Then they've got to look to see when the ball is released, in case there is an overthrow. 


As the hosts needed nine runs off three balls, all-rounder Ben Stokes hit the ball into the deep off Trent Boult and ran for a double.New Zealand had set up 242 for England. There's a lot of 'what ifs' and 'what should bes' and 'what could bes' that happen off those 600-plus deliveries. In the end, England were announced as the winner as they had hit more boundaries, 26, as compared to New Zealand's 17 boundaries in the match.

According to the Law 19.As a result, five runs should have been awarded to England and Stokes should have been at the non-striker's end for the next ball. You've got the best two umpires in the elite panel doing the final. The judgment error was the timing of when the fielder threw the ball. They did not cross on their second run, at the instant of the throw."We're not perfect. And that happens every delivery of the game. They forget we make 1000s of decisions every match," he said."They've then got to follow on and see what happens after that, whether there is a run out, whether there's an 'obstructing the field', whether the ball is taken fairly. I think it's unfair to say that the World Cup was decided by that one event. And then they've got to back to see where the two batsmen are," he said.England scripted history as it claimed its first-ever World Cup title. England scripted history as it claimed its first-ever World Cup title. They're doing their best like the other two teams are. As a result, England were awarded six runs - two for a double and four for an overthrow. 

 There's multitudes of decisions to be taken off the one delivery. That's the nature of sport," he said."In this particular case, the umpires have got a lot on their plate, because like every ball, they've had to watch the batsmen complete the first run, they've had to watch the ball being fielded, to understand how it's in play, whether the fielder's done the right thing. So given that scenario, five runs should have been the correct allocation of runs, and Ben Stokes should have been at the non-striker's end for the next delivery," he said.Taufel, who had umpired during the 2011 World Cup final, confirmed that Dharmasena and Marais Erasmus made a mistake. The final will be remembered for ages as it did not have a winner after the 50-over and super over action, both of which were tied. That's the act."There was a judgment error on the overthrow.Taufel, a member of the MCC Laws subcommittee, also said that the umpires did their best and it would be unfair to say that one decision costed New Zealand their maiden victory in the tournament.The retired Australian umpire said that there was a judgment of error as Stokes and Adil Rashid had not crossed for the second run.

Taufel, who had umpired during the 2011 World Cup final, confirmed that # the officiating umpires Kumar Dharmasena and Marais Erasmus made a mistake. In the end, England were announced as the winner as they had hit more boundaries, 26, as compared to New Zealand's 17 boundaries in the match.8 related to an "overthrow or wilful act of fielder", says, "If the boundary results from an overthrow or from the wilful act of a fielder, the runs scored shall be any runs for penalties awarded to either side, and the allowance for the boundary, and the runs completed by the batsmen, together with the run in progress if they had already crossed at the instant of the throw or act. This is just part of the game.Taufel, who was named the International Cricket Council (ICC) Umpire of the Year every year from 2004 to 2008, further said the umpires have to follow and examine whether there is a run out, an obstruction on the field and whether the ball has been taken fairly.

However, Taufel defended the officiating umpires, saying the umpires have to consider a number of things while examining every ball. (Photo:AP/AFP) Sydney: A day after England lifted its maiden ICC Men's Cricket World Cup trophy, former Australian umpire Simon Taufel on Monday said that England should have got only five runs instead of six runs off the third ball of the last over against New Zealand. 

The replays showed that the England batsmen had not crossed at the time of the throw. The final will be remembered for ages as it did not have a winner after the 50-over and super over action, both of which were tied. New Zealand's Martin Guptill threw the ball in an attempt to run out Stokes but the ball bounced off Stokes' bat and reached the boundary. What's unfortunate is that people think that umpiring is just about outs and not outs. The act of the overthrow starts when the fielder releases the ball

Posted by: keychaintoys at 02:32 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 886 words, total size 5 kb.

<< Page 1 of 1 >>
36kb generated in CPU 0.0086, elapsed 0.0389 seconds.
28 queries taking 0.0323 seconds, 54 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.